Home

Consulting Services

Seminars

About Morgan

Contact Us

 

 





Morgan Group LLC - Consultants to Technology-Driven Enterprises

 

 

 


 Background for New Opportunity Assessment

 

Investment Evaluation: Notes and explanation

(This evaluation format is courtesy of an “Early Revenue Stage Venture Fund”.  Every fund is different here.  Know your customer before you go in.)

 

Different investors will have different criteria, based on the size of a Venture fund to "get buy-in” from the partners, take the "gut" out of the equation, and document their decisions so they can learn from their successes and mistakes.  Use their wisdom and experience to your advantage.

 

1.      Current Sales:  (Have you been able to do something already?)

q       Startup=0,

q       >$0.2M=1,

q       $0.2-0.5M=2-3,

q       $0.5-2.0M=4-5

 

2.      Profitability:  (How deep is the black hole before cash flow is positive?)

q       Profitable for a while and EBITDA>10% =5,

q       Profitable now =4,

q       Breakeven =3,

q       Maybe profitable next year =2,

q       After next year =1

 

3.      Gross Margins: (According to GAAP) (at profitability)

q       >60% =5,

q       50% =3,

q       <40% =1

 

4.      Industry Risk: (Is this a good industry to be investing in?)

(check the boxes that apply, and make an "average assessment" between 5 and 1)

 

Good =5                                  score                            Not so good =1

Very high growth market (>100%/year)

 

 

Low growth or declining market

Changes peoples lives (for the better)

 

 

Incremental improvement

Reasonable sized niche portion of the  market, ($0.2-3.0B)

 

 

Potential broad market (>$3B), of interest to big competitors

Imperfect emerging market

 

 

Hot today, but could be cold tomorrow

Long life cycle

 

 

Short window of opportunity

Customers reachable

 

 

Customers loyal to others (Any B-C)

Long lead time required,  but you are ready to go

 

 

Long time still needed to get to market

 

E.g. Cancer Cure = high risk:  Long time, FDA risk, Big potential competitors

 

 

5.      Competitive Advantage:  (Can you effectively compete in the market?)

 

High CA =5                             score                            Low CA=1

Low cost provider

 

 

 

Expensive product or service.  Possible for competition from 3rd world.

Control over distribution

 

 

 

Distribute through others.  No forced loyalty of the channel

No (little) pricing pressure

 

 

 

Commoditization forces in the market

Proprietary know-how,

or strong IP

 

 

IP Protection: None or weak

Lead time advantage

 

 

 

Aggressive competition can jump in

Cornerstone customers in place

Exclusive supply contracts

 

 

No legal or contractual agreements

Well developed contacts and networks

 

 

New field for key team members

Your advantage is clear, documented, and measurable

 

 

Customers can’t differentiate easily, prior to buying

Hard to detect the know-how, or "special sauce"

 

 

Easily copied by Bill or Larry (Gates or Ellison)

 

e.g.  The "next web hosting business".  Why not use India?

 

 

6.      Competition Intensity:  (Does everyone want to compete with you?)

 

Low CI =5                               score                            High CI=1

Sleepy market.  Old technology.  Not too exciting

 

 

Lots of smart or big players in the space,   cool technology

Reasonable sized market, won’t attract sharks

 

 

Hot market.  Everyone is trying to get in

Have unique “ease of access” to market

 

 

Everyone looks the same to the customer

Niche defined and defendable

 

 

Easy to expand into market from another business base

Tough business for anyone except it's a slam dunk for this team

 

 

Opportunity is attractive to very smart people

 

e.g.  The next "Customer Relationship Management" software.  (e.g. Salesforce.com with Larry Elison on your BOD, who then went and competed directly, without telling them he was doing it.)

 

7.      Projected Growth Rate: (Is this a reasonable business of sufficient size to survive?)

The investor will usually discount your projections here.  Typical discounts are to divide by 2.  Growth applies to both the business AND the market.  (If the market is growing also, your numbers receive less of a discount).  If the investor gets a sweet deal, or can use leverage, they may take a lower rate.  (Beware of presenting a "lifestyle business).

 

Your planned growth:

q       >4x per year =5,

q       100% =3,

q        40% =2,

q       20% =1

(Rule of thumb: If your required white collar headcount is growing >60%/yr (after about 30 or so), probably not believable and will be discounted.  Use partnership or acquisitions to grow faster.)

 

8.      Investment Opportunity: (What is in it for me?)

This is the investor’s number, based on his assessment of valuation, investment and risk.  You should not present a “valuation”, but should have one that you would discuss, and be prepared to defend it with data.

q       IRR: 100% = 5,

q       70% =4,

q       50% =3,

q       40% =1-2.

q       No (or unbelievable) exit strategy =0   (regardless of IRR)

If risk is small (downside well covered), 40% =3.  If you have a well developed deal presentation, nicely presented= big help.  E.g. "we anticipate a pre-money valuation of $xx, based on these comparables, adjusted for the current market.”; and when the investor checks, he agrees.

 

9.      Barriers to entry:  (Can you slow down or keep out a competitor?)

 

High Barriers=5                        score                Low Barriers=1

Hard to get into the business

 

 

 

Easy to enter

Big prior investment of time and money (especially time)

 

 

Guy in garage

Good rolodex of contacts and networks

 

 

Outside your network of contacts

Great reputation in the industry

 

 

Who?

Strong patents or equal (with money to defend)

 

 

 

No IP, or no money to defend, or problems with IP, or customers want competition, etc.

 

e.g. web service firms today.  (Sapient, Scient, Viant )

 

 

10.  Product or Service Differentiation: (Is your advantage clear to the customer?)

 

High Diff =5                             score                            Low Diff =1

Sustainable. 

 

 

You are working to establish the market, big guys can come in and clean up.

Very unique, Hard to copy or learn from you

 

 

Can learn all your stuff from looking at your product

Your advantage is clear, documented, and measurable

 

 

Can’t detect the difference without trying it out first (e.g. consulting services)

No substitutes or replacements

 

 

Substitutes available

Good Brand

 

 

No brand

 

e.g. The next small DSL service company.  (ATT is just waking up)

 

11.  Management team: (Can they do it, will they do it)

 

q       Hot young entrepreneurs = 1

q       Professional experience = 2

q       Experienced Management team = 3

q       Team has done it once already, successfully = 4 (e.g. Mark Andreeson, Netscape)

q       (Grey hair on the team = +1/2pt.)

q       (Highly motivated leader – i.e. Strong Psychic Contract = +1pt.)

q       (Solo Entrepreneur, no obvious strong team = -2pts)

q       (Low sense of urgency = -1pt)

 

12.  Working Business Model:  (How large is the customer's pain, and are they involved?)

 

q       Yes, for a few years, customers love it, solves a big pain = 4,

q       Just got it working, a few key customers involved = 3,

q       Prototype = 2,

q       In development = 2

q       Demo = 1

q       (if revenue from a strong recurring revenue stream = +1pt);

q       (if recurring revenue is not clearly there, -1 pt.  Service businesses = -1pt.)


 

13.  Fatal Flaws:  (Any one is sufficient to kill a venture.  Check number of obvious flaws, each one counts -1)

 

q       No real customer

q       Can't access the customer

q       Wrong corporate culture

q       Intellectual Property company ( PhD syndrome)

q       Ignorant of market

q       Over engineering of product

q       Failure to stress test properly, or recognize importance of stress testing

q       Poor sub suppliers or partners

q       More than one person from any "family".

q       Trying to do too much

q       Lifestyle business

q       Wrong location

q       Competition can drop their price and kill you

q       Market window has closed

q       Microsoft (or equal) in your space

q       Leaders focused on technical issues, not business issues

q       Green team, or no diversity

q       Inappropriate team (Unmotivated, wrong skills)

q       Lack of focus of leaders and management (toys, other interests)

q       Team doesn't listen (or recognize good advice vs. bad advice)

q       Monarch or King syndrome

q       Arrogance

q       Any key team member obsessed with his "position or title"

q       Too many time conflicts on the leader

q       Business violates “human nature” in some way

q       No real sense of Urgency

q       _____________________________

q       _____________________________

q       _____________________________

q       _____________________________

q       _____________________________

q       _____________________________

 

 

 

 

 

To Top


 

125 Poppasquash Rd
Bristol, RI 02809
617-592-8379
617-592-8378